Andreas Hock, «From Babel to the New Jerusalem (Gen 11,1-9 and Rev 21,1–22,5)», Vol. 89 (2008) 109-118
There are some salient points of contact between the narrative of Babel, Gen 11:1-9, and the vision of the New Jerusalem, Rev 21:1–22:5. These parallels are starkly contrastive. Among the most stunning parallels are the way man’s initiative is
underscored in Gen, while God’s initiative is emphasized in Rev. Human accomplishment appears to be at the heart of the narrative in Genesis, whereas God’s accomplishment is presented in Rev. Moreover, worldly reputation is set in
opposition to heavenly fame, as well as a worldwide dispersion in Gen as it is being contrasted with a worldwide unification in Rev. The essay’s conclusion is that the protological text is brought to fulfillment in the eschatological one in an inverse archetypal sense.
118 Andreas Hock
advanced significantly over the time of Babel. Still the humans disobey. But
God is still Savior and comes down to save humanity from itself (36): “No one
has ascended into heaven except the one who descended from heaven, the Son
of Man†(Joh 3,13).
Saint John Vianney Theological Seminary Andreas HOCK
1300 South Steele Street
Denver, CO 80210
SUMMARY
There are some salient points of contact between the narrative of Babel, Gen 11:1-9,
and the vision of the New Jerusalem, Rev 21:1–22:5. These parallels are starkly
contrastive. Among the most stunning parallels are the way man’s initiative is
underscored in Gen, while God’s initiative is emphasized in Rev. Human
accomplishment appears to be at the heart of the narrative in lgenesis, whereas
God’s accomplishment is presented in Rev. Moreover, worldly reputation is set in
opposition to heavenly fame, as well as a worldwide dispersion in Gen as it is being
contrasted with a worldwide unification in Rev. The essay’s conclusion is that the
protological text is brought to fulfillment in the eschatological one in an inverse
archetypal sense.
(36) Cf. D. COTTER, Genesis (Berit Olam, Collegeville, PA 2003) 70.