Mark Leuchter, «Tyre’s “70 Years” in Isaiah 23,15-18», Vol. 87 (2006) 412-417
Isaiah 23,15-18 has often been regarded as part of a Josianic redaction, aligning
the temporal parameters of Isaiah’s oracle against Tyre with Josiah’s reign.
Previous investigations into this passage, however, have relied on matters of strict
chronology to establish this Josianic connection. The Josianic character of the
passage is more readily evident through its invocation of an important cuneiform
document from the reign of Esarhaddon, corresponding with other Josianicera
literary works strongly influenced by Assyrian rhetoric. Tyre’s “70 Years”
deploys language once reserved for the Mesopotamian deity Marduk, contributing
to the way in which a Judean audience in the 7th century should conceive of their
own deity YHWH.
Tyre’s “70 Years†in Isaiah 23,15-18
Many scholars have noted a number of incursions into the Isaianic corpus that
may be ascribed to a redaction during the second part of Josiah’s reign (627-
609 BCE) (1). A pivotal text in this proposed redaction is Isa 23,15-18, which
serves as the climax of the book’s foreign nation oracles and pertains to the
status of Tyre. Though the chapter may be attributed in large part to an
original 8th century oracle addressing the dominance of Sennacherib over
Phoenician territory, vv. 15-18 have been viewed as secondary accretions that
reinterpret the polemical force of the original text (2). In its current context,
the verses point to the period when the foreign nations, including the city-
state of Tyre, will fall subject to YHWH’S rule in place of that of Assyria and
prepares the 7th century audience for the material in Isa 24–27 that presents
the interests of the Josianic court as part of the prophet Isaiah’s message for
the Israelite nation (3).
Central to the ascription of these verses to the Josianic era is the reference
to a 70-year period of divine chastisement against Tyre found in vv. 15 and
17. Scholars who advocate a Josianic provenance of these verses date the
beginning of this period to 701, the year Sennacherib campaigned against the
west-Semitic states that included both Phoenicia and Judah, thus arriving at
631 — roughly a decade into Josiah’s reign — as the end of this period of
chastisement (4). Further, 701 would serve as an appropriate date for the
foundation of time-span that culminates in the reign of Josiah, as it is with the
events of 701 (or events associated with that year) that the Zion tradition
emerged as a dominant theological stream that would inform Deuteronomic/
Deuteronomistic discourse (5).
Interpreting the events of 701 for both Jerusalem and Tyre as the will of
YHWH only strengthens the ideological basis of the Deuteronomistic literature
that emerged under Josiah. A chronological problem arises, however, when
considering Isa 23,15-18 in relation to 701 and why the authors chose the
number 70 to denote the duration of the chastisement of Tyre. Though Josiah
was on the throne in 631, Assurbanipal still held power over Assyria (and,
consequently, over Judah). Though the Chronicler later states that Josiah
(1) For an overview, see M. SWEENEY, King Josiah of Judah. The Lost Messiah of
Israel (Oxford 2001) 234-37.
(2) M. SWEENEY, Isaiah 1–39 (FOTL; Grand Rapids, MI 1996) 306-310; J.
Blenkinsopp (Isaiah 1–39 [AB; New York – London – Toronto – Sydney – Auckland
2000] 345) views the verses as secondary but dates them to a considerably later period.
(3) SWEENEY, King Josiah, 247-248.
(4) H.J. KATZENSTEIN (The History of Tyre [Jerusalem 1973] 296-297) discusses the
historical concomitance of this dating. See also SWEENEY, Isaiah 1–39, 309-310.
(5) On the significance of the events of 701 and the consequent centrality of a
Jerusalem-centric worldview, see B. HALPERN, “Jerusalem and the Lineages in the Seventh
Century BCE: Kinship and the Rise of Individual Moral Liabilityâ€, Law and Ideology in
Monarchic Israel (ed. B. HALPERN – D.W. HOBSON) (JSOTSS, 124; Sheffield 1991) 11-
107. For ideological/typological connections between Hezekiah and Josiah, see SWEENEY,
King Josiah, 64-76.