Andrew E. Arterbury - William H. Bellinger, «“Returning” to the Hospitality of the
Lord. A Reconsideration of Psalm 23,5-6», Vol. 86 (2005) 387-395
The image of God as host in Ps 23,5-6 is best interpreted in light of the ancient
custom of hospitality. The subsequent interpretation then emboldens us to
translate Ps 23,6 more literally as “I shall return to the house of the Lord” rather
than “I shall dwell in the house of the Lord”.
340 Paul Heger
authority to the injured party, or declared that no offence has been
committed. Adultery is punished by death (LH 12), but it is the
husband’s prerogative to forgive both parties, or impose a lesser
penalty. A socially motivated regulation allows a wife to live with
another man, have children with him and be maintained by him if her
husband did not provide for her sustenance during his extended
absence; at his homecoming she returns to him (LH 134 and 135). The
Hittite codex has a long list of non-permitted sexual intercourse
between relatives and between man and animal, but there are no fixed
sanctions provided for their transgression. It seems that the betrayed
husband may kill his adulterous wife and the involved man on the spot,
but if he brings them to court, the king decides their fate. Similarly, the
king can forgive and spare the life of both.
c) Use of Divine Punishment
Israelite social decrees for the protection and support of the poor
and vulnerable members of society are, due to their nature, directed at
the individual, not to the public authority. Their implementation is not
precisely specified, and therefore remains primarily dependent on the
goodwill of the persons directly involved. On the other hand, since God
is the lawgiver and also involved in the implementation of His decrees
(as argued above), He is expected to punish those who disregard those
commands that cannot be established and punished by human courts.
Precepts whose quantities or details are not specified, such as the laws
of gleaning in Lev 19,9.10, conclude with the utterance “I am the Lord
your Godâ€, or an abbreviated form, “I am the Lordâ€. From the legal
point of view, if the owner leaves just a minimal edge of the field or a
scant quantity of fallen grain or overlooked grapes, he has fulfilled the
command. Therefore, God warns such a man that He is aware of the
extent of his performance, and will punish him for circumventing the
essence of the command. This same utterance appears many times in
this chapter, which abounds with ethical commands. These commands
all share the particular feature that their performance, or lack thereof,
cannot be established by other humans, and is only known to the
offender and to God. This is probably the motive for the extraordinary
reiteration of the utterance “I am the Lord your Godâ€. Certain illicit
sexual relations, if undetected or witnessed by only one person, are
considered to be punished by God, not humans.
Slander is a further example. In Israelite law it is, reasonably
enough, punished by God, not by humans (Lev 19,16). In Assyrian law