Jean-Noël Aletti, «Galates 1–2. Quelle fonction et quelle démonstration?», Vol. 86 (2005) 305-323
This article is an attempt to show the following: (1) Galatians 1,11–2,21 is a
unified argument in which vv. 11-12 constitute the propositio; (2) Gal 2,14b-21
represent a short speech bringing the argument to its climax, and (3) Gal 2,16
takes up the Jerusalem agreement about Paul’s Gospel and not only fulfills a
rhetorical function within the short speech of v. 14b-21 but also provides the
thesis of the argument that unfolds in Galatians 3–4.
“Returning†to the Hospitality of the Lord 393
the passersby and convince them to accept hospitality in their home. For
example, Abraham sees his guests from a distance and runs out to meet them
(Gen 18,2-5). Even though Lot’s guests first decline his offer, he strongly
urges them to enter his tent (Gen 19,1-3). Laban runs out to greet Abraham’s
servant, who becomes his guest (Gen 24,29). Jael encourages Sisera to turn
aside into her tent (Judg 4,18), and the Shunammite woman persuades Elisha
to eat in her home (2 Kgs 4,8).
This proactive approach to hospitality is noticeably embellished in both
Philo’s and The Testament of Abraham’s reflections on Abraham’s
hospitality. Philo says Abraham ran out of his house and begged the strangers
who were passing by his home to stay with him because he was so eager to
extend hospitality to them (Philo, Abr. 107). “For in a wise man’s house no
one is slow in showing kindness; but women and men, slaves and free, are
full of zeal to do service to their guests (xenizomevnwn)†(Philo, Abr. 109;
LCL). In The Testament of Abraham, the author tells us that Abraham pitched
his tent at the crossroads of the oak of Mamre so that he could “welcome
everyone who passed by — rich and poor, kings and rulers, the crippled and
the helpless, friends and strangers, neighbors and passersby†(T. Abr. 1.1-2).
In a similar manner, Job is also portrayed as being highly proactive in his
extension of hospitality to strangers. According to later tradition, Job was so
determined to be prepared for any traveler who might pass by that he kept
thirty tables spread at all times. These tables were to be used exclusively by
strangers (T. Job 10.1-3, cf. 25.5 and 53.3). In addition, given this emphasis
on hosts taking the initiative with potential guests in both the Hebrew
Scriptures and in later Jewish literature, it is not surprising that Paul directs
the Roman Christians to pursue (diwvkonte") (38) hospitality as a manifestation
of love in Rom 12,13b. These proactive stances toward hospitality suggest
that the ideal host for both ancient Israel and for later Judaism should go out
seeking strangers to be his or her guest rather than simply waiting for
strangers to approach him or her.
Thus, Ps 23 not only contrasts the psalmist’s enemies with goodness and
mercy, but the psalm also personifies goodness and mercy in the form of the
ideal host of the Hebrew Scriptures. Saying that goodness and mercy pursue
the psalmist is not very different from saying that righteous hosts like
Abraham, will pursue the psalmist for the rest of his or her days.
e) Ps 23,6b – “and I will return to the house of the Lord the length of my
daysâ€.
First, it is somewhat puzzling that most interpreters do not translate the
verb (bwv) as “return†in Ps 23,6. Instead, they opt for the more traditional
rendering of “dwell†(bvy), even when they acknowledge that “return†(bwv) is
the literal reading of the text (39). Others wrestle with this problem when they
(38) This is the same root word that is found in Psalm 23,6 LXX.
(39) E.g., NAS; CRAIGIE, Psalms, 204; W.O.E. OESTERLEY, The Psalms (London 1962)
183; and KRAUS, Psalms 1-59, 304. Craigie contends that “and I shall return in the house of
the Lord†is the literal reading. Similarly Kraus acknowledges that the MT reads, “and I
come backâ€, which would “refer to a vow of pilgrimageâ€. Yet, Kraus says the Septuagint
and Jerome’s translation of “and I dwell†is the better translation.