Jerome H. Neyrey, «"First", "Only", "One of a Few", and "No One Else". The Rhetoric of Uniqueness and the Doxologies in 1 Timothy», Vol. 86 (2005) 59-87
The distinctive way of honoring gods or God was to celebrate
what is unique about them, that is, praise of persons who were the "first",
"only", or "one of a few" to do something. Rhetoric from Aristotle to Quintilian
expounded the theory of "uniqueness", which the authors of Greek hymns and
prayers employed. One finds a Semitic counterpart in the "principle of
incomparability" describing Israelite kings. "Uniqueness" pervades the New
Testament, especially its doxologies. In them, "uniqueness" was richly expressed
in rhetorical mode, as well as by predicates of negative theology which elevated
the deity above those praising.
“Firstâ€, “Onlyâ€, “One of a Fewâ€, and “No One Else†63
(megivstai") or the first (prwvtai") or the most numerous (pleivstai")
honours. “Most numerous gods†applies to the Athenians: it is said
that Dionysus, Apollo, Poseidon, Athena, Hephaestus, and Ares — all
of these or most of them — have honoured Athens. “Best godsâ€
applies to Zeus at Olympia and Nemea. “Greatest honours†is
applicable to the Athenians because they claim that every provision
comes from the gods. “Most necessary honours†are to be found in the
case of the Egyptians, who claim that astronomy and geometry came
from the gods. “Most ... †applies to eloquence and philosophy; these
are considered especially the prerogatives of the Athenians (10).
The traditional marks of uniqueness (“best†and “firstâ€) are clear;
but new ones are added, “greatest number†of gods and “best†and
“most numerous†benefits. Thus, Athens is unique among the Greek
cities: the best god, Zeus, honors her with his benefaction; and the
greatest number of gods labor to benefit the city (Dionysus, Apollo,
Poseidon, Athena, Hephaestus, and Ares). Athens was the first to be so
honored, or to be honored with the best benefactions, or to have
received the most numerous honors (11).
In summary, we should give considerable weight to the way deeds
are amplified in rhetoric, because these criteria for praise represent the
conscious, continuous articulation of the rhetorical tradition. Writers
such as Aristotle may be primarily codifying the practice of his day;
nonetheless he makes formal the general principle which others
intuitively grasped or observed occurring in actual literary and
forensic practice.
2. Rhetorical Practice
a) Funeral Speeches
Athenian funeral speeches constitute a distinctive body of rhetoric
of praise, several of which Aristotle actually mentions in his Rhetoric.
We visit them to examine their use of amplification by uniqueness.
Together with rhetorical theory cited above, these examples attest that
the principle of uniqueness was a constant literary tradition from
Athens’ golden age down to the age of the progymnasmata.
(10) D.A. RUSSELL – N.G. WILSON, Menander Rhetor (Oxford 1981) 1.362.4-
20. See also Plutarch, On the Fame of the Athenians 345F-346A.
(11) Certain crimes and misdeeds were considered unique in wickedness; for
example Rhetoric to Herennius: “We show that it is not a common but a unique
(singular) crime, base, nefarious, and unheard-of (in-usitatum), and therefore
must be the more promptly and drastically avenged†(2.30.49, emphasis added;
see also Cicero, de Inventione 1.54.103).