Nadav Na’aman, «Death Formulae and the Burial Place of the Kings of the House of David», Vol. 85 (2004) 245-254
The article re-examines the death formulae of the kings of Judah, in particular those of the kings from Hezekiah onward. It is suggested the kings of Judah in the tenth-eighth centuries BCE were buried in the palace, and that Hezekiah transferred the burial place of the kings of Judah to a new site (the garden of Uzza) outside the walls of Jerusalem. Hezekiah’s decision to transfer the burial place might have been influenced by the admonitions and possible pressure of the temple priests, who felt that the burial in the palace defiled the adjacent temple (see Ezek 43,7-9). The change in the closing formulae of the late kings of Judah should be explained on the basis of the reality of the late monarchical period and the objectives of the authors of the Book of Kings, and in no way indicates an early edition of the Book of Kings as some scholars suggest.
250 Nadav Na’aman
next to the segment that stood ‘opposite the tombs of David’. The Fountain
Gate and the King’s Pool also appear in the description of the tour conducted
by Nehemiah around the destroyed city wall of Jerusalem (Neh 2,14-15). All
scholars agree that the two segments of the rebuilt wall mentioned in Neh
3,15-16 were located near the southeastern end of the city (31).
The King’s Garden is mentioned in 2 Kgs 25,4 and Jer 52,7. Weill
suggested that it was located on the slopes of the Kidron Valley in the
southeast end of the City of David, and was irrigated by Canal II, and later by
Canal IV (32). In his discussion of the Siloam Tunnel, Ussishkin suggested that
Hezekiah, in imitation to the kings of Assyria, planted a royal park near the
walls of the City of David, and that the water of the Siloam tunnel were used
to irrigate the garden situated outside the city, near the southeast of the City
of David (33). The garden of Uzza, which in 2 Kgs 21,18 is called ‘the garden
of his house’, is clearly the King’s Garden mentioned in 2 Kgs 25,4; Jer 52,7
and Neh 3,15. Hence the reference in Neh 3,16 to the tombs of David refers
to the tombs of the late kings of Judah who were buried in the garden of
Uzza (34). Like other ancient Near Eastern kings, the kings of Judah built more
than one palace, and I assume that a royal residence was built near the newly
planted royal park (see Jer 22,13-14)(35). Manasseh’s ‘garden of his house’
probably refers to this residence (compare 1 Kgs 21,1-2).
(31) M. AVI-YONAH, “The Walls of Nehemiah – A Minimalist Viewâ€, IEJ 4 (1954)
239-248 (esp. 240); JEREMIAS, Heiligengräber, 56; H.G.M. WILLIAMSON, “Nehemiah’s
Wall Revisitedâ€, PEQ 116 (1984) 81-88; H. ESHEL, “Jerusalem under Persian Rule: The
City’s Layout and the Historical Backgroundâ€, The History of Jerusalem: The Biblical
Period (eds. S. AHITUV – A. MAZAR) (Jerusalem 2000) 333-341 (esp. 334) (Hebrew).
(32) WEILL, “La Pointe sudâ€, 113-117; ID., La cité de David. Campagne de 1923-1924
(Paris 1947) 57-73. WEILL (“La Pointe sudâ€, 117) concluded his early discussion as
follows: “Au-dessous de la vieille courtine J 1, dans le Cédron qui s’élargit et se creuse,
l’eau trouve elle de vastes pentes où l’irrigation entretient un verger magnifique: les
Jardins du roi fleurissent toujours, du haut en bas de ce flanc de valléeâ€. See also Y.
SHILOH, Excavations at the City of David (Qedem 19; Jerusalem 1984) 23.
(33) D. USSISHKIN, “The Water Systems of Jerusalem during Hezekiah’s Reignâ€,
Meilenstein. Festgabe für Herbert Donner (eds. M. GÖRG – M. WEIPPERT) (ÄAT 30;
Wiesbaden 1995) 300-303. For criticism of Ussishkin’s suggestion that the Siloam tunnel
was hewn mainly for the watering of the royal park, see A. MAZAR, “Was Hezekiah’s Tunnel
Dug in Vainâ€, Cathedra 78 (1995) 187-188 (Hebrew); ID., “Jerusalem’s Water Supply in the
First Temple Periodâ€, The History of Jerusalem (AHITUV – MAZAR) 221-224 (Hebrew).
(34) Weill (La cité de David, 35-44) argued that the burials after the reign of Ahaz were
outside the walls of Jerusalem. Provan (Hezekiah, 136 and n. 12) criticized his suggestion,
arguing that Manasseh’s palace, and therefore the garden of Uzza (2 Kgs 21,18), were
within the walls of Jerusalem. He ignored the explicit reference to the king’s garden and the
tombs of David in Neh 3,15-16, and did not consider the possibility that the kings of Judah
could have had more than one residence. Moreover, Provan (Hezekiah, 134-138) apparently
assumed that our sources supply detailed information of the building operations of the kings
of Judah, and dismissed all suggestions that are not based on evidence explicitly mentioned
in the Bible. It must be emphasized that we know very little about the building projects
carried out by the kings of Judah, and it is entirely legitimate to make assumptions on the
basis of the archaeological research of Jerusalem and ancient Near Eastern documents.
(35) An example of a garden located near the palace appears on Ashurbanipal’s garden
party relief. See P. ALBENDA, “Grapevines in Ashurbanipal’s Gardenâ€, BASOR 215 (1974)
5-17; R.D. BARNETT, “Assurbanipal’s Feastâ€, Eretz Israel 18 (1985) 1*-6*; K.-H. DELLER,
“Assurbanipal in der Gartenlaubeâ€, BaghM 18 (1987) 229-238; I. ZIFFER, “What Happened
under the Grapevine? New Insights into Ashurbanipal’s Garden Party Reliefâ€, Eretz Israel
27 (2003) 204-211, with earlier literature (Hebrew).