Andrew M. Bowden, «The Fruit of Righteousness in James: A Study in Discourse Analysis.», Vol. 26 (2013) 87-108
In this study, a discourse analysis of James is conducted with the goal of better understanding the structure, theme, and cohesion of the letter. By paying careful attention to the details of the text, James’ paragraphs are identified, as are the signals of transition between the various paragraphs. The conclusions reached based on a discourse analysis of James are illuminating. Far from being a randomly arranged work, James repeatedly uses present prohibitory imperatives in the overall organization of the Epistle. These imperatives are important in marking transitions between main sections. Furthermore, a discourse analysis reveals that James is a coherent epistle comprised of 16 paragraphs, with 3,13-18 providing the overarching macrostructure of the letter. Bearing the fruit of righteousness, a theme prominent in 3,13-18, is seen to be the letter’s overarching and unifying thought.
94 Andrew M. Bowden
In addition, several subthemes that will play an important role in the
letter are introduced. First, 1,15 introduces the important connection
between sin and death (ἁμαρτία … θάνατον), both of which play
prominent roles in the letter. In the previous paragraph, James discussed
how temptation reveals areas where believers are lacking. Now, James
teaches that temptation leads to sin and ultimately death. James will have
more to say about sin and death in the letter. In fact, it seems that the
letter is moving steadily in that direction, since the closing instructions
in 5,16 mention the confession of sins, and the final admonition in 5,19-
20 is to turn sinners from their wandering, thereby saving their souls
from death and covering a multitude of sins27. Secondly, the connection
between τέλειον and ἄνωθέν appears in 1,17, and both of these terms
appear throughout the letter. This prepares the reader for the letter’s
central section which speaks about the σοφία which is ἄνωθεν (3,15.17).
Finally, the theme of fruit resurfaces in this paragraph28.
In summary, through grammatical and parallel linkage, vv. 1,13-18
are seen to be a coherent paragraph which introduce some of the letter’s
central motifs, many of which also appear in the core of the letter (3,13-
18).
2.2.1.3 Living as God’s Firstfruits (1,19-27)
This paragraph is marked by the imperative Ἴστε in v. 19 and the
vocative ἀδελφοί μου ἀγαπητοί29. The paragraph continues uninterrupted
to its conclusion in 1,27. As in the first introductory paragraph (1,2-
12), this third paragraph concludes in the indicative. Also similar to the
first paragraph, this section is marked by an imperative which is then
developed by subordinated imperatives linked with δέ30. Thus, in v. 19b
James writes ἔστω δέ and in v. 22 γίνεσθε δέ. Each imperative relates
to the λόγος by which believers were birthed (1,18), and this paragraph
explains what it means to live as God’s firstfruits. Living as God’s
27
On these themes, see also 2,9.26; 4.2.8.17.
28
The rich were compared in 1,11 to withered plants; 3,18 describes the fruit of peace;
3,12 refers to figs, olives, and grape vines; 5,7 describes the farmer eagerly awaiting fruit;
and 5,17 compares prayer for the confessing sinner with Elijah’s prayer that produced fruit
on the earth.
29
The verb Ἴστε could function as either an indicative or imperative. Context as well as
James’ typical usage seems to call for the imperative.
30
Cf. Verseput, who argues that the particle is meant to clarify what was said about
receiving the word with gentleness and should be translated as “indeed” or “furthermore”
(“James 1,19-27: Anger in the Congregation”, in D.L. Bock and B.M. [eds.], Interpreting The
New Testament Text: Introduction to the Art and Science of Exegesis [Wheaton 2006] 435).