Paul Danove, «The 'aiteo' / 'aiteomai' Distinction in the New Testament: A Proposal.», Vol. 25 (2012) 101-118
This article investigates the seventy New Testament occurrences of aiteo to determine the motivation for and distinctive implications of the verb’s active and middle forms. The introductory discussion specifies the semantic and syntactic characteristics of aiteo and develops two features that have implications for distinguishing verbal usages. The discussion then proposes the distinction between active and middle forms and demonstrates this distinction in occurrences of the verb.
112 Paul Danove
If you remain in me and my sayings remain in you, [with affect] ask for
whatever you wish, and it will happen for you.
In John 16:26 asking by Jesus’ name again is the constraint, and the
perspective is that of Jesus.14 This occurrence differs from the preceding
occurrences (16:22-23) in not providing an explicit assurance that what
is requested will be given. Thus the constraint is not fulfilled explicitly,
and the verb form is middle.
ἐν ἐκείνῃ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί μου αἰτήσεσθε (John 16:26)
On that day, you [with affect] will ask by my name.
The remaining two active and three middle occurrences appear in the
context of other active and middle occurrences. Except for the change
in usage and James and John as the referent of the Agent in both state-
ments, the occurrences in Mark 10:35-38 parallel those in Matt 20:20-22.
The context of the active occurrence introduces no explicit contextual
constraints on the action, while the context of the middle occurrence
introduces an unfulfilled constraint recognized by Jesus: being able to
drink Jesus’ cup and to be baptized with the baptism with which Jesus is
baptized. Thus the verb form is middle.
προσπορεύονται αὐτῷ ᾿Ιάκωβος καὶ ᾿Ιωάννης οἱ υἱοὶ Ζεβεδαίου
λέγοντες αὐτῷ· διδάσκαλε, θέλομεν ἵνα ὃ ἐὰν αἰτήσωμέν σε ποιήσῃς
ἡμῖν…ὁ δὲ ᾿Ιησοῦς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς· οὐκ οἴδατε τί αἰτεῖσθε. δύνασθε πιεῖν τὸ
ποτήριον… (Mark 10:35, 38)
James and John the sons of Zebedee came to him saying to him, “Teacher,
we want that you do for us whatever we ask”…But Jesus said to them, “You do
not know what you [with affect] are asking; are you able to drink the cup…”?
The three occurrences in Jas 4:2-3 appear in statements by James with
members of his community as Agent. The contextual statements that
members of the community are involved in inappropriate actions (vv.
1-2a) that make them friends of the world and enemies of God (v. 4)
identify appropriate actions and friendship with God as the constraints
on asking God for something. These constraints are recognized by James
but not by the Agent. The occurrence in v. 2, which appears in the
statement that some members of the community don’t ask, reflects the
perspective of James that they could not fulfill the constraints, even if
14
This discussion follows the UBS punctuation, which distinguishes the contexts of the
occurrences in John 16:23-24 and 16:26.