192 Antonio Piñero odological problem of searching for parallels. Then he analyses 2Pe 1:1-11, and examines parallels from the OT, Pauline Chris- tianity, rest of the NT, Philo, Josephus, Plutarch, Stoic writers. The conclusion is that 2Pe 1:4 refers to a widely-held complex of ideas. In them the main influence is of Pauline ideas, but Middle Platonic thought exerted some influence. 122. TALSHIR, Z., “Textual and Literary Criticism of the Bible in Post- modern Times. The Untimely Demise of Classical Biblical Philol- ogy”, Henoch 21 (1999) 235-252. This art. chiefly reflects upon new methodologies applied to OT text, but its consideration have also validity for NT philology: the postmodern approach to text (T.L. Thompson; N.P. Lemche; P.R. Davies) has reduced the knowledge of the past to nothing: they merely consider texts as products of their earliest surviving manuscripts. This consid- eration demolishes earlier achievements of biblical philology in reconstructing the past. 123. WILLIAMS, C.H., I Am He. The ‘Ani Hû’ in Jewish and Early Chris- tian Literature (WUNT 2, 113). Tübingen (Mohr) 2000, XIV + 408 pp. This investigation analyses the use of Ani Hû in biblical and ancient Jewish texts, and offers an interpretation of the ἐγώ εἰμι syntagms in Mark’s and John’s gospels or analogous. In each text the a. studies the syntactic implications and devotes a great space to detailed linguistic analysis. INDEX NEW TESTAMENT 61 117 In general 72 122 74 1 75 2 76 GOSPELS 3 78 In general 7 80 12 85 9 13 88 14 20 90 35 23 91 82 26 107 84 30 110 31 114 41 116