Troy D. Cudworth, «The Division of Israel’s Kingdom in Chronicles: A Re-examination of the Usual Suspects.», Vol. 95 (2014) 498-523
The Chronicler constantly adapts the story of Israel’s kingship from the narrative in Samuel-Kings to show his great interest in the temple. With regard to the division of the united kingdom, recent scholarship has correctly shown how he has removed all the blame from Solomon due to his successful construction of the temple, but it has not come to any firm conclusion on whom the Chronicler does find guilty. This article contends that the Chronicler blames Rehoboam for ignoring the plea of «all Israel», an essential facet of the nation’s temple worship.
002_cudworth_498_523 24/02/15 11:57 Pagina 518
518 TROY D. CUDWORTH
direct insight into the Chronicler’s own understanding of the divi-
sion of the kingdom. From this text, Knoppers contends that the
Chronicler’s Abijah condemns Jeroboam for his institution of a
false kingship in 13,5-7, a blatant assault on the divinely sanctioned
Davidic kingdom. Of course, such an interpretation would give vi-
ability to his argument that the Chronicler inserted Jeroboam’s
name in the text at 10,2.3, and 12 (see above). Though Japhet places
the blame more on the people (less on Jeroboam), she also argues
that the Chronicler uses the speech in 2 Chr 13,4-12 to change his-
tory with a revision of the northern secession more favorable to Re-
hoboam 61. In what follows, I will show that the Chronicler has
stayed much closer to the storyline in 1 Kings than Knoppers or
Japhet have argued.
Abijah’s speech divides nicely into two parts, an explanation of
how the once unified kingdom split in the past (vv. 5-7) and a com-
parison of the two autonomous kingdoms in the present (vv. 8-12).
The second quite clearly contains a rebuke directed at the north-
erners for their idolatrous cult, but does the first really offer an
indictment for the establishment of a separate kingship as Knoppers
and Japhet have claimed? 62
Abijah’s opening statement may seem to point in that direction.
After a brief address to the northerners (v. 4b), Abijah declares, “Do
you not know that YHWH the God of Israel gave kingship over Israel
to David and his sons forever as a covenant of salt?” (v. 5) 63. The
content of this verse refers back to 1 Chr 17,14 when YHWH prom-
ised David a place in his (i.e. God’s) kingdom for all time. Later,
at the end of his reign, David’s speech to the different leaders of
Israel in 28,1-10 asserted the continuance of this promise since
God had chosen his son Solomon after him “to sit on the throne
of the kingdom of Yahweh over Israel” (v. 5). Even so, an element
of individual conditionality remained in the covenant for the Da-
vidic kings as stated later in v. 9b: “If you seek (Xrd) him, he will
be found by you, but if you forsake (bz[) him, he will cast you
off forever”. For Solomon specifically, this meant carrying out
61
JAPHET, I & II Chronicles, 691-692.
62
See also DE VRIES, 1 and 2 Chronicles, 295; KLEIN, 2 Chronicles, 200.
63
See the discussion in JAPHET, I & II Chronicles, 691. This expression
points to the eternal nature of the covenant; cf. Lev 2,13; Num 18,19.