Nadav Sharon, «Herod's Age When Appointed Strategos of Galilee: Scribal Error or Literary Motif?», Vol. 95 (2014) 49-63
In Antiquities Josephus says that Herod was only fifteen-years-old when appointed strategos of Galilee in 47 BCE. This is often dismissed as scribal error and corrected to twenty-five, because it contradicts other Herodian biographical information. However, this unattested emendation does not fit the immediate context, whereas 'fifteen' does. This paper suggests that rather than a scribal error, this is a literary motif, presenting Herod as a particularly young military hero. The specific age of fifteen may have had a deeper intention, fictively linking Herod's birth to the year 63, the year of Augustus' birth and Pompey's conquest of the Temple.
03_Biblica_Sharon_Layout 1 01/04/14 11:46 Pagina 53
53
HEROD’S AGE WHEN APPOINTED STRATEGOS OF GALILEE
sibility, that it is a general observation, should be preferred. Namely,
the gist of the passage — and the adverbs used seem to imply this
as well — is that he was exceptionally young to fulfill the role he
was given; that is, it is an issue of competence and experience, not
of law. Indeed, Herod’s youth is emphasized especially in the An-
tiquities narrative. Immediately following the statement of his age
Josephus writes: “But his youth (h` neo,thj) in no way hindered him,
and being a young man (o` neani,aj) of high spirit, he quickly found
an opportunity for showing his prowess†(Ant. 14.159). In fact, an
investigation of such statements in Classical literature as to some-
one’s young age shows that they generally do not refer to legal lim-
itations but rather to experience and competence. This is quite
clearly stated in the case of Demetrius, son of Philip V of Macedo-
nia, when he came to Rome to defend his father against some accu-
sations in 184-183 BCE. Polybius says that the senators “saw that
he [i.e., Demetrius] was still quite young (ne,on ὄnta komidh|/) and
very far from being competent to face such a whirl of complica-
tions†(Polybius, 23.2.2).
There are numerous other cases with similar terminology regard-
ing young age (e.g., Polybius, 15.7.1; Cassius Dio, 39.56.5), but, for
our purposes, the most important case is found in Nicolaus, who
was probably Josephus’ source for Herod’s age. In his biography of
Augustus, Nicolaus reports that when Octavian was deliberating
which course of action to take after he heard of Caesar’s assassina-
tion, one of the suggestions was that he should join the army that
was in Macedonia, take it, go to Rome, and take vengeance upon
the conspirators. However, that suggestion was not adopted because
it “seemed a difficult course for a very young man (avndri. komidh|/
ne,wi), and too much for his present youth and inexperience … â€
(Vit. Caes. Frg. 130, 16) 14. It seems to me that precisely this is the
point emphasized in our passage as well: Herod was appointed and
was even successful despite his youth and inexperience.
Now, if this is in fact the gist of the passage, the age of twenty-
five certainly does not seem to fit the context. Three centuries ear-
lier Alexander the Great took the throne at the age of twenty and
within a few years conquered much of the known world; more re-
cently, Pompey Magnus celebrated a triumph when he was approx-
14
FGH II, 398. Translation by C.M. Hall (1923); online at:
http://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/nicolaus.html