Juan Manuel Granados Rojas, «Is the Word of God Incomplete? An Exegetical and Rhetorical Study of Col 1,25», Vol. 94 (2013) 63-79
The common reading of plhro/w in Col 1,25 has emphasized the apostolic task of preaching the gospel everywhere. We agree with other scholars that such a completion has not only spatial meaning but also a qualitative one. Yet, our research goes further: what kind of quality is this? The rhetorical devices of «accumulation» and «reversal» combined in 1,24-29 point to an ethical purpose. In this sense, «bringing to completion the word of God» means preaching the word, but also making everyone mature in Christ. The phrase includes both the diffusion of the gospel and the achievement of its ethical purpose.
75
IS THE WORD OF GOD INCOMPLETE?
The syntax is characterized here by prepositional and participial
accumulation amplifying and enriching the semantics, in this parti-
cular case, of the intercessory report’s purpose. In 1,9b-10a the phrase
“so that you may be filled with the knowledge of God’s will in all
wisdom and spiritual understanding†is further expanded by an ethi-
cal purpose: “to live in a way worthy of the Lord, pleasing him in
allâ€. The participial and prepositional phrases that follow in 1,10b-
12 (see figure above: a b c d) amplify and explain this ethical finality.
The train of thought in the section then seems to be this: inter-
cessory report + cognitive purpose + ethical finality. Within this
progression plhro,w (passive) means to be filled with something,
i.e. with knowledge. However, the most important assertion is dif-
ferent: receiving this knowledge leads to living according to the
Lord, bearing fruit in every good work and growing in the know-
ledge of God. Briefly, using plhro,w to describe the purpose of
Paul’s intercession in favor of believers also has an ethical nuance.
The recent debate on Pauline epistolary introductions has been
focused on the source and function of both the valetudinis formula
and the introductory thanksgiving (euvcaristw/ formula). Some au-
thors have rightly suggested that only the Deuteropauline letters
combine thanksgiving reports and intercessory prayer reports 36. In
Col 1,9, for example, the expression dia. tou/to picks up the content
of the previous thanksgiving and becomes the reason for the Pau-
line intercession 37.
See, in this sense, the temporal compounds of the reports in Col 1,3b.9a:
36
pa,ntote peri. u`mw/n proseuco,menoi and avf’ h-j h`me,raj hvkou,samen.
See the discussion in the following: S.E. PORTER – S.A. ADAMS, Paul and
37
the Ancient Letter Form (Pauline Studies 6; Leiden 2010) 33-100; J.T. REED,
“Are Paul’s Thanksgivings Epistolary?â€, JSNT 61 (1996) 87-99; P. ARZT, “The
Epistolary Introductory Thanksgivingâ€, NT 36 (1994) 29-46; J.L. WHITE, “Saint
Paul and the Apostolic Letter Tradition†CBQ 45 (1983) 433-444; G.P. WILES,
Paul’s Intercessory Prayers: The Significance of the Intercessory Prayer Pas-
sages in the Letters of St Paul (MSSNTS 24; Cambridge 1974); J.T. SANDERS,
“The Transition from Opening Epistolary Thanksgiving to Body in the Letters
of the Pauline Corpusâ€, JBL 81 (1962) 348-362; P. SCHUBERT, Form and Func-
tion of the Pauline Thanksgivings (BZNW; Giessen 1939).
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati