Paul Foster, «Is Q a 'Jewish Christian' Document?», Vol. 94 (2013) 368-394
Recent research has generated different hypotheses concerning the social location of Q. This discussion commences with an examination of scholarship on the phenomenon of 'Jewish Christianity' and theories concerning the social location of Q. Next, meta-level questions are addressed, concerning how social location is determined from a text. The discussion then considers four areas mentioned in Q that might be of potential significance for determining social location. These are references to synagogues, the law, Gentiles, and unbelieving Israel. In conclusion, the inclusive perspectives may suggest that the document had a more positive attitude toward Gentiles than is often stated.
03_Biblica_Foster_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 372 03_B
372 PAUL FOSTER
ing with a Greek-speaking Jewish Christian community based in
Palestine. Further, he noted connections with prophetic forms of
speech drawn from Jewish circles 18.
Alongside this, another strand of Q scholarship was emerging
almost simultaneously, which saw the mission of followers of Jesus
as being focused on Israel. Thus Hoffmann saw a relationship be-
tween the theological orientation of Q and the type of Israel-centric
prophetism related to the call for renewal in the preaching of John
the Baptist. The necessity of a double geographic origin for the ori-
gin of Q became a less popular theory, even though certain scholars
maintained that there were discrete stages in the literary formation
of the document. Consequently a growing consensus emerged that
located Q somewhere in Palestine (but not usually Jerusalem) 19,
or Galilee, or southern Syria 20. However, Kloppenborg has pre-
sented the most comprehensive exposition of the case for a Galilean
location of the Q community 21.
Kloppenborg argues that although there is a shift in the formal
characteristics of the collection with the addition and redaction of the
Q2 layer this does not necessitate a change in audience 22. Thus the
emphasis in describing “social location†falls more upon the ideolog-
ical and religious beliefs and values of both author and audience than
on the questions of geographical locale. It is noted that the genre and
rhetoric of the two initial layers of Q are not reflective of the highest
level of professional scribalism. Consequently, the “framers of Q are
scribes, to be sure, but their interests and inclinations do not coincide
with the scribes and literati of Jerusalem†23. Moreover, Kloppenborg
disputes the significance that some have attributed to the notion of
itinerancy that has at times been ascribed to Q 24. Also direct links
SCHULZ, Q, die Spruchquelle der Evangelisten, 57, 177.
18
P. HOFFMANN, Studien zur Theologie der Logienquelle (Münster 1972)
19
332, 333.
C.M. TUCKETT, Q and the History of Early Christianity (Edinburgh
20
1996) 102-103.
KLOPPENBORG, Excavating Q, esp. 171-175, 255-261.
21
J.S. KLOPPENBORG, The Formation of Q. Trajectories in Ancient Wis-
22
dom Collections (Philadelphia, PA 1987).
KLOPPENBORG, Excavating Q, 210.
23
In particular see G. THEISSEN, Sociology of Early Palestinian Christi-
24
anity (trans. J. Bowden) (Philadelphia, PA 1978).
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati