Koog P. Hong, «Abraham, Genesis 20–22, and the Northern Elohist», Vol. 94 (2013) 321-339
This article addresses the provenance of the Elohistic Abraham section (Genesis 20–22) in order to clarify the divergence between the source and tradition-historical models in pentateuchal criticism. Examining arguments for E’s northern provenance demonstrates that none of them applies directly to E’s Abraham section. The lack of Abraham tradition in early biblical literature further undermines the source model’s assumption of Israel and Judah’s common memory of the past. The southern provenance of Genesis 20–22 is more likely, and the current combination of Abraham and Jacob traditions is probably a result of the Judeans’ revision of Israelite tradition.
01_Biblica_Hong_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:54 Pagina 337 01_B
337
ABRAHAM, GENESIS 20–22, AND THE NORTHERN ELOHIST
The trace of this gradual change in the memory of the ancestral
history is embedded in biblical literature. The memory of Abraham
as the father of Israel is sparse in early biblical tradition outside the
Pentateuch. Even when his name appears, Abraham is remembered
seldom alone but mostly as the head of the triad Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob. That is, within the Pentateuch, Abraham is mentioned always
within the triad 67. Outside the Pentateuch, Abraham occurs only
twenty-five times, among which only four times (Isa 51,2; 63,16;
Ezek 33,24; Neh 9,7-8) is Abraham remembered independently of
Jacob. The formation of the triad, as several scholars have pointed
out, has a late origin 68. In contrast, Jacob is remembered as an ances-
tral figure much more frequently. The majority of these instances
occur outside the Pentateuch (134 times), more than five times the
occurrences of the name of Abraham. Among them, only twice (2 Kgs
13,23; Jer 33,26) is Jacob remembered as a part of the triad. That is,
unlike Abraham, Jacob is mostly remembered independently as the
father of Israel outside the Pentateuch. Particularly noteworthy is the
status of these patriarchs in prophetic literature, especially in eighth-
century prophecy, which channels early witnesses. The wealth of
memory of Jacob as the father of Israel in Isaiah, Hosea, Amos,
Micah, and Jeremiah is starkly contrasted with the dearth of memory
of Abraham as the father in those books. This probably means that
Jacob’s status as the founding father of Israel is independent of and
precedes the later formation of the ancestral triad. It is only later in
the history of Israelite thought that Abraham began to be remembered
independently as the founding figure of the people of YHWH.
How to reconstruct the development of Abraham’s status in Is-
raelites’ memory constitutes a subject of its own. But at least one
can say that the absence of Abraham, as well as Jacob’s indepen-
dence from him in early biblical tradition, supports our conclusion
that northern Israelites did not remember Abraham as their father.
* *
*
Exod 2,24; 3,6.15.16; 4,5; 6,3.8; 32,13; 33,1; Lev 26,42; Num 32,11;
67
Deut 1,8; 6,10; 9,5.27; 29,13; 30,20; 34,4.
E.g. R.J. TOURNAY, “Genèse de la triade ‘Abraham-Isaac-Jacob’â€, RB
68
103 (1996) 321-336; M. KÖCKERT, Vätergott und Väterverheißungen. Eine
Auseinandersetzung mit Albrecht Alt und seinen Erben (FRLANT 148; Göt-
tingen 1988).
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati