Philipp F. Bartholomä, «John 5,31-47 and the Teaching of Jesus in the Synoptics. A Comparative Approach.»
Within Johannine scholarship, the assumed differences between Jesus’ teaching in John and in the Synoptics have frequently led to a negative judgment about Johannine authenticity. This article proposes a comparative approach that distinguishes between different levels of similarity in wording and content and applies it to John 5,31-47. What we find in this discourse section corresponds conceptually to a significant degree with the picture offered in the Synoptics, though couched in a very different idiom. Thus, the comparative evidence does not preclude us from accepting this particular part of Johannine speech material as an authentic representation of the actual content of Jesus’words.
Biblica_1:Layout 1 21-11-2011 12:59 Pagina 388
388 PHILIPP F. BARTHOLOMÄ
vocate 32. There is no need, says Jesus in John 5,45a, for him to
stand up as their accuser: “Do not think that I will accuse you before
the Fatherâ€. Rather, according to John 5,45b, it is Moses, their es-
teemed lawgiver, who is a continuing witness against them: “your
accuser is Moses, on whom you have set your hopeâ€. While Jesus’
denial of being the ultimate accuser is without significant synoptic
counterpart [0/0-level of closeness], 5,45b has at least some concep-
tual similarity to Mark 7,6-13 par. (cf. also Matt 12,41-42 par.). In
this utterance the Synoptic Jesus not only likewise invokes another
Old Testament writer as an accuser against the Jews (“Isaiah proph-
esied rightly about you hypocritesâ€), but also points out that signif-
icant parts of their religious rules indeed contradict Mosaic teaching
(“For Moses said … But you say …â€) [0/1-level of closeness].
Jesus then directly addresses the witness of Scripture in John
5,46-47, saying: “If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for
he wrote [e;grayen] about me. But if you do not believe what he
wrote [toi/j evkei,nou gra,mmasin], how will you believe what I say?â€
This probably refers to a misguided way of reading Scripture. “The
reason why Moses would accuse them was that he, as the lawgiver,
knew the law’s true purpose. (…) [Jesus] refers to the Jews’ failure
to grasp the true essence of the Scriptures, including their prophetic
orientation toward Jesus†33. The content of these last two verses of
the discourse shows a close resemblance to Jesus’ teaching in the
Synoptics. The other Gospels clearly address the unwillingness of
the Jews to listen truly to the Scriptures in general and to the writings
of Moses in particular, thus resulting in a lack of understanding of
what these writings are about. At the end of the parable of the rich
man and Lazarus in Luke 16,31, Jesus has Father Abraham say: “If
they do not listen to Moses [Mwu?se,wj] and the prophets, neither will
they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead†[1/2-level
of closeness] 34. Both John and the Synoptics maintain that Jesus’
teaching is in line with revered scriptures, and accordingly both con-
clude that “one’s response to Jesus is an indicator of how one has re-
32
Cf. KÖSTENBERGER, John, 194; as well as CARSON, John, 265-66; MOR-
RIS,John, 295.
33
KÖSTENBERGER, John, 195.
34
Luke 16,31 is mentioned as a synoptic parallel to John 5,46-47 by
NA27; BLOMBERG, Historical Reliability, 117; CARSON, John, 266; KEENER,
John, I, 661; cf. also KÖSTENBERGER, John, 195, n. 107.