Paul Foster, «The Pastoral Purpose of Q’s Two-Stage Son of Man Christology», Vol. 89 (2008) 81-91
It is argued that Q constructs a two-stage Son of Man Christology. The first stage presents a suffering figure whose experiences align with the contemporary situation and liminal experience of the audience of Q. The second stage focuses on
the future return of the Son of Man. It is at this point that group members will receive both victory and vindication. However, these two stages are not always maintained as discrete moments. By employing the title 'the coming one', Q at some points collapses this temporal distinction to allow the pastorally comforting message that some of the eschatological rewards can be enjoyed in the contemporary situation of the community.
The Pastoral Purpose 91
proclamation of the coming one, who will arrive with the elements of spirit
and fire, alludes both to judgment and to purification.
The use of the title “coming one†is important in terms of the two-stage
Son of Man Christology, since it creates a bridge that links the present role of
the suffering Son of Man with the future role as eschatological judge. This is
done not only by creating a link between present and future, although this is
part of the mechanism employed especially in Q 3,16-17. Rather, in a more
sophisticated way Q also collapses the dimension of time, as history revolves
around the coming one in Q 7,22. This is achieved by bringing the
eschatological horizon into the present. The author of Q achieves this through
Jesus’ reply to the Baptist concerning his own fulfilment of the Isaianic
activities. As Bock succinctly notes, “[t]he time of eschaton is evidenced in
Jesus’ works†(36). This is an extremely important factor in analyzing the way
Q formulates its Christology for a liminal and persecuted audience. The
earthly ministry of Jesus assures the community that their own sufferings are
imitations of those experienced by him as the Son of Man. His future return
will be the age of judgment and vindication, when their steadfast confession of
Jesus will be rewarded by his confession of the faithful as his own (37). Yet
these two aspects are not totally polarized. The fact that the eschatological
horizon has broken into the present through the ministry of Jesus, means that
there is a foretaste of future blessing in the community’s own present. Thus
the Christology of Q is formulated with a strong pastoral concern, which
addresses the perceived present persecutions of the Q community. Believers
are promised future reversal, along with a partial experience of that
eschatological future in their present situation.
School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh Paul FOSTER
Mound Place, Edinburgh, EH1 2LX, UK
SUMMARY
It is argued that Q constructs a two-stage Son of Man Christology. The first stage
presents a suffering figure whose experiences align with the contemporary
situation and liminal experience of the audience of Q. The second stage focuses on
the future return of the Son of Man. It is at this point that group members will
receive both victory and vindication. However, these two stages are not always
maintained as discrete moments. By employing the title “the coming oneâ€, Q at
some points collapses this temporal distinction to allow the pastorally comforting
message that some of the eschatological rewards can be enjoyed in the
contemporary situation of the community.
(36) D.L. BOCK, Luke 1:1–9:50 (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI 1994) 662.
(37) The positive aspect of this confession by Jesus on behalf of those who have openly
declared their faith is recognized by Valantasis. Commenting on individuals who make such
open confession Valantasis notes “Jesus will stand up for them at the last day, giving
positive testimony in the eschatological divine court in the presence of angels who surround
God’s judgment seatâ€, R. VALANTASIS, The New Q. A Fresh Translation with Commentary
(New York – London 2005) 157.