Albert L.A. Hogeterp, «Resurrection and Biblical Tradition: Pseudo-Ezekiel Reconsidered», Vol. 89 (2008) 59-69
Analysis of 4QPseudo-Ezekielb (4Q386) fragment 1 columns I-II reveals that this parabiblical Qumran composition stands in a more intricate dialogue with biblical
tradition than previously assumed. This article refines previous argument that contrasted the apocalyptic vision of resurrection in 4QPseudo-Ezekiela (4Q385)
fragment 2 to the prophetic vision of national restoration in MT Ezekiel 37 (/ MasEzek). 4QPseudo-Ezekielb 1 i-ii exhibits an apocalyptic vision which incorporates both resurrection for the pious in Israel and an eschatologized notion of restoration. Textual dialogue in Pseudo-Ezekiel together with textual tradition in Papyrus 967 attest to an eschatological reading of Ezekiel 37 constituting an early part of biblical tradition.
Resurrection and Biblical Tradition 69
IV. Evaluation and Conclusions
In conclusion, the evidence of Pseudo-Ezekiel stands in an intricate
relation to the biblical text of Ezekiel. As a specimen of ‘rewritten Bible’,
Pseudo-Ezekiel comprises more elaboration on biblical passages of Ezekiel
than previously assumed. While the ‘apocalyp-tization’ of Ezekiel 37 has
been generally acknowledged mainly on the basis of fragment 2 of Pseudo-
Ezekiela, the composition as it appears from two columns of Pseudo-Ezekielb
yields the idea that the ‘apocalyptization’ does not substitute the supposed
original sense of the biblical text. Pseudo-Ezekiel elaborates on both the
symbolical imagery of revivification and on gathering, return and restoration
of the people of Israel (40). Perhaps the biblical text already provides a point of
departure for the intertwined occurrence of resurrection and restoration, for
the symbolical imagery of revivification not only occurs in Ezekiel 37,1-10,
but also recurs in the interpretive section, in Ezek 37,12-13. Pseudo-Ezekielb
provides a perspective in which resurrection for the righteous has its setting in
eschatological restoration of God’s people in the land of Israel. The prophetic
notion of restoration has thereby also become eschatologized. A horizon of
eschatological expectations of restoration is also common to Qumran
sectarian texts like the Isaiah Pesher (4Q163 [4Qpap pIsac] 4-6 II 8-12), and
the War Scroll (1QM I 3). This could explain the interest of Pseudo-Ezekiel as
‘adopted text’ for the Qumran community.
Catholic University Leuven Albert L.A. HOGETERP
St.-Michielsstraat 6
B-3000 Leuven
Belgium
SUMMARY
Analysis of 4QPseudo-Ezekielb (4Q386) fragment 1 columns I-II reveals that this
parabiblical Qumran composition stands in a more intricate dialogue with biblical
tradition than previously assumed. This article refines previous argument that
contrasted the apocalyptic vision of resurrection in 4QPseudo-Ezekiela (4Q385)
fragment 2 to the prophetic vision of national restoration in MT Ezekiel 37
(/ MasEzek). 4QPseudo-Ezekielb 1 i-ii exhibits an apocalyptic vision which
incorporates both resurrection for the pious in Israel and an eschatologized notion
of restoration. Textual dialogue in Pseudo-Ezekiel together with textual tradition
in Papyrus 967 attest to an eschatological reading of Ezekiel 37 constituting an
early part of biblical tradition.
DIMANT, DJD 30, 10 observed that “the outline of Ezekiel 37-43 strings the surviving
40
passages (of Pseudo-Ezekiel) into a coherent sequence, and assigns all these scenes to the
sphere of the final, redemptive eraâ€. However, rather than the biblical text per se as
background for searching thematic coherence, the editorial role of the author of Pseudo-
Ezekiel in providing thematic coherence throughout the elaboration on Ezekiel 37 and other
Ezekielian passages may be more prominent, as I have aimed to demonstrate.