Csaba Balogh, «'He Filled Zion with Justice and Righteousness'. The Composition of Isaiah 33», Vol. 89 (2008) 477-504
In contrast to most opinions concerning Isa 33 this pericope is far too complex to be explained as one coherent literary unit. Isa 33 has a short anti-Assyrian woe-cry at its bases (vv. 1+4), which once closed the woe-cries of Isa 28–32. Vv. 1+4 were supplemented first (around 598 or 587) by a communal lament, vv. 2-3+5+7-12, bringing the idea of the punishment of Judah and the temporised destruction of the enemy in vv. 1+4 further. Second, (shortly after 539) vv. 1-5.7-12 were expanded by a salvation prophecy, vv. 6+13-24, concerning the returnees, the restoration of Jerusalem and the monarchy.
500 Csaba Balogh
Beside these, the imagery of kingship in Isa 33,13-24 is
particularly important. As noted, vv. 17 and 21 presuppose an indirect
form of theocracy. The human king appears to be an anti-type of the
foreign ruler in several respects. First, the appearance of the new
monarch in Jerusalem in v. 17 is contrasted with the disappearance of
the oppressors in vv. 18-19 (109). Second, characterising the new king as
hwhy ryda contrasts him with the Assyrian king, the former [hwhy] ryda of
Isa 10,34 or yndal ≈maw qzj of Isa 28,2 (Isa 28 was also cited by 33,19!).
Third, presenting the new king as protective μyrhn and μyray reminds the
reader of Isaiah of Isa 8,7-8, in which Assyria is compared to a mighty
river (μybrhw μymwx[h rhnh), overflowing all its banks, swirling over and
washing away the land of Immanuel. In the above mentioned
28,2.15.17-18, the enemy is a sweeping flood passing through
YHWH’s country, which feels itself secure without YHWH’s
protection (110). μyrhn and μyray may also allude to the Euphrates and the
Nile, and implicitly to the northern and southern border of the empire
of the new Davidic king (111).
The description of Jerusalem as a royal city compared to a tent
(lha) shows a link with Isa 4,2-6; 16,4-5 and 32,1-2 (cf. also dywd tks
in Am 9,11). Isa 4,2-6 combines the imagery of kingship (hwhy jmx /
≈rah yrp) with the protection offered to Zion. Over against the enemy
symbolised as a rainstorm (28,2), 4,5-6 speaks about canopy (hpj), hut
(hks; cf. Ps 76,2), refuge (rwtsm) and shelter (hsjm; cf. also Isa 25,4; Ps
46,2). In Isa 16,4-5, the king in the tent of David (lha) offers protection
for refugees. In Isa 32,1-2, the righteous king and his officers are
compared to a shelter (rts) before a rainstorm and to streams of waters
(μymAyglp) on a dry place.
The secure dwelling alongside a watery place brings Isa 33,6+13-
24 particularly close to Isa 32. The scene of destruction in 32,14 is
expanded there with the promise of restoration, described in a language
close to Isa 33. According to 32,18 the people live in a secure
settlement (μwlv hwnb) and an untroubled resting place (twnnav tjwnmb; cf.
ˆnav hwn in 33,20). The prosperity of its abode (ˆkvm; cf. lha in 33,20) is
to last for ever (μlw[Ad[, 32,17; cf. 33,6.20). In both cases prosperity is
the result of fpvm and hqdx (32,16-17) and both emphasise the presence
of great rivers (32,20 | 33,21). These two texts, both formally designed
(109) Cf. “you will see†(v. 17), “you will not see†(v. 19).
(110) Cf. also Isa 17,12-13; Ps 77,17-20.
(111) See Gen 15,18; Deut 11,24; Jos 13,2-7; 2 Sam 8,3; 1 Kgs 4,21.