John Kilgallen, «Luke wrote to Rome – a Suggestion», Vol. 88 (2007) 251-255
Luke wrote, concerned to help Theophilus comprehend the reliability of the things he had been taught. One of the teachings to Theophilus in this tumultuous century is, it seems most likely, an explanation as to how it is that he, a pagan, has become a full member of an exclusionary religion that began as thoroughly Jewish. This attention to Theophilus, it is suggested, makes necessary a story that geographically and chronologically arrives and finishes at the place where
Theophilus and his community are; it is to them the story is written (Luke 1, 4). Luke’s work does not stop till Rome, 61 AD, but stops there and then. This strongly suggests Luke’s satisfaction that he has told a story which finally arrives where Theophilus is. That Luke stops his work at Rome, 61 AD, indicates Theophilus and his church are there. By Luke’s story, Theophilus understands the truth many teachings, particularly about his place in God’s plan of salvation.
- «Acts 28,28 — Why?» 2009 176-187
- «Luke 20,13 and i1swj» 2008 263-264
- «What Does It Mean to Say That There Are Additions in Luke 7,36-50?» 2005 529-535
- «Hostility to Paul in Pisidian Antioch (Acts 13,45) — Why?» 2003 1-15
- «Martha and Mary: Why at Luke 10,38-42?» 2003 554-561
- «‘With many other words’ (Acts 2,40): Theological Assumptions in Peter’s Pentecost Speech» 2002 71-87
- «The Obligation to Heal (Luke 13,10-17)» 2001 402-409
- «`The Apostles Whom He Chose because of the Holy Spirit'
A Suggestion Regarding Acts 1,2» 2000 414-417
- «The Strivings of the Flesh
(Galatians 5,17)» 1999 113-114
- «Jesus First Trial: Messiah and Son of God (Luke 22,66-71)» 1999 401-414
- «The Importance of the Redactor in Luke 18,9-14» 1998 69-75
- «Was Jesus Right to Eat with Sinners and Tax Collectors?» 2012 590-600
Luke wrote to Rome – a Suggestion 255
intention was created precisely to “bring to completion†the expectations of
Jesus that what was foreseen by Jesus in Acts 1, 8 will come to pass — as the
world history has shown. But it is we who construct this relationship between
Rome and ‘the end of the earth’, as we try to explain why Luke ends his story
in Rome and not ‘at the end of the earth’.
*
**
We have considered the two opinions that are the basis of this essay – 1)
that the reason Luke stopped his writing at Rome, 61-63AD, was that his two-
volume narrative for Theophilus and his community has clarified and made
solidly convincing (in a way better, in Luke’s mind, than others did), how it
came to be that Theophilus received the saving word of God and was made
equal to Jewish Christians in the blessings of faith in Jesus, and 2) that Luke
was satisfied to stop his writing once he reached Rome, 61AD, for from there
one can imagine (and such was Luke’s intention) the future witness about
Jesus reaching “to the end of the earthâ€. The data for justifying either theory
is admittedly slim [of ‘hard’ data there is none], but the bases of argument are,
we think, in favor of the first opinion above. In short, Luke is interested in
supporting the faith of Theophilus through supporting the teachings he has
received; Luke is not concerned with the offer of the word of salvation ‘to the
end of the earth’. Given his unique interest in writing his second volume, one
can suppose that, should he have wanted to bring the saving word of God to
the end of the earth, he would have done more than merely suggest it as a
goal.
Pontifical Biblical Institute John KILGALLEN
Rome 00187
SUMMARY
Luke wrote, concerned to help Theophilus comprehend the reliability of the
things he had been taught. One of the teachings to Theophilus in this tumultuous
century is, it seems most likely, an explanation as to how it is that he, a pagan, has
become a full member of an exclusionary religion that began as thoroughly
Jewish. This attention to Theophilus, it is suggested, makes necessary a story that
geographically and chronologically arrives and finishes at the place where
Theophilus and his community are; it is to them the story is written (Luke 1, 4).
Luke’s work does not stop till Rome, 61 AD, but stops there and then. This
strongly suggests Luke’s satisfaction that he has told a story which finally arrives
where Theophilus is. That Luke stops his work at Rome, 61 AD, indicates
Theophilus and his church are there. By Luke’s story, Theophilus understands the
truth many teachings, particularly about his place in God’s plan of salvation.