Peter Dubovský, «Tiglath-pileser III’s Campaigns in 734-732 B.C.: Historical Background of Isa 7; 2 Kgs 15–16 and 2 Chr 27–28», Vol. 87 (2006) 153-170
The aim of this article is to investigate Tiglath-pileser III’s campaigns against the
Levant in 734-732 B.C. The campaigns can be divided into three phases. In the
first phase, the Assyrians conquered Tyre and the coast. In the second phase, they
defeated Syrian troops in battle, conquered Transjordan and made a surprise
attack on the Arabian tribes. In the last phase, they conquered Damascus, Galilee
and Gezer. In the second part of this article, the author investigates the logistics
of these campaigns and at the end the author evaluated the consequences of the
Assyrian invasion in terms of human and material losses and the administrative
reorganization of the region.
164 Peter Dubovsk´
y
— from its most important supporter — Urartu. Once this was
achieved, in the following campaigns Tiglath-pileser III laid siege on
Arpad and after three years conquered it (740 B.C.).
This strategy became one of the favorite military tactics of Tiglath-
pileser III’s successors as well. Sargon II in his campaign in 710-707
B.C. against Merodach-Baladan II and his Elamite ally, first drove a
wedge between Elam and Babylonia by leading his army along the
eastern bank of the Tigris. Once the members of the coalition were
separated from each other, Merodach-baladan II left Babylon and the
city fell into Sargon II’s hands shortly after (35).
4. Results of the campaigns
The instability of the political scene in the ancient Near East was
one of the characteristics of that period. Thus, to conquer states of the
Levant and then to leave it on its own would mean losing in short time
what was gained during sophisticated and costly military intervention.
The account of the results of the campaigns and the reorganization of
the region can illustrate another aspect of Tiglath-pileser III’s genius.
a) Human losses
According to Table 1. Aram and Israel seem to suffer the most
serious repercussions of the rebellion. Summ. 4:16’ mentions that
Tiglath-pileser III deported from Israel “all his (Pekah’s) peopleâ€. As
for Aram, Tiglath-pileser III deported 800 people from the home of
Rezin ([URUx]-ha-a-da-ra), 750 captives from South-syrian cities
Kurus≥s≥a and Sama, and 550 from Meturna (Ann 23:13’-5’). Moreover,
Tiglath-pileser III destroyed 591 cities of 16 districts of Damascus
(Ann 23:16’-7’). Ann 18 and 24 mention a total of 13,520 deportees(36);
however, their fragmentary status does not allow specifying where the
deportees came from. These numbers do not include the captured
soldiers mentioned in Ann 23:6’-7’. Biblical sources mention the
deportation from Ijon, Abel-beth-maacah, Janoah, Kedesh, Hazor,
Gilead, Galilee, and the land of Naphtali (2 Kgs 15,29). The Chroni-
cler ’s account mentions the deportation of the Reubenites, the Gadites,
and the half-tribe of Manasseh (1 Chr 5,26) and the deportation of
Beerah, the chieftain of the Reubenites (1 Chr 5,6).
(35) H.W.F. SAGGS, The Might That Was Assyria (Great Civilizations Series;
London 1984) 96.
(36) NA’AMAN, “Tiglath-Pileser IIIâ€, 273.