Jeffrey C. Geoghegan, «Israelite Sheepshearing and David’s Rise to Power», Vol. 87 (2006) 55-63
An analysis of the relevant texts (Genesis 31; 38; 1 Samuel 25; 2 Samuel 13) reveals
that sheepshearing in ancient Israel was a significant celebration characterized
by feasting, heavy dirinking, and the settling of old scores. As a result of
these associations, sheepshearing became an ideal backdrop for events in Israel’s
past involving the repayment of debts or the righting of wrongs. Because both
David and Absalom took advantage of sheepshearing for this purpose — and in
the process aided their own ascents to the throne — sheepshearing became intimately
associated with the emergence of the royal clan (Genesis 38) and the establishment
of the Davidic dynasty.
60 Jeffrey C. Geoghegan
attribute the presence of ≈rpyw in these verses to scribal error (metathesis),
arguing that the text originally read wbAr≈pyw, “and he pleaded with him†(21).
That they are not alone in this expectation (cf. LXX, 4QSama, Syr. and OL)
should not surprise us. Yet, it is the unexpected ≈rpyw that seems the preferred
reading, since, lectio difficilior aside, the verbal root ≈rp plays an important
role in the other Davidic sheepshearings. In 1 Samuel 25, David is accused by
Nabal of being among those “pËras≥â€-ing from their masters during the time
of sheepshearing (v. 10). This is understandable since he is a descendant of a
certain Peres≥ who was conceived during the time of sheepshearing and who
was himself a “pËras≥â€-er (Gen 38,29), an action that secured his right to be
the progenitor of the royal clan. Later, David is “pËras≥â€-ed upon by his own
son, Absalom (after all, he is a Peres≥-ite, too), in connection with a
sheepshearing (2 Sam 13,25.27), and in what seems to be an attempt at
securing (perhaps even seizing, had David attended the shearing) his father’s
throne.
Yet, the connections do not end here. We will recall a text that is peculiar
in isolation, but that takes on new significance in light of the present study. In
2 Samuel 14 we are informed of Absalom’s appealing physical characteristics,
among which is his voluminous hair (vv. 25-26). He is said to have had such
thick hair that he shaved it the same time each year: the start of spring
(µymyl µymy ≈qm) – the same time sheep were shorn in ancient Israel (22). The
weight of his hair is even calculated in Ï€eqËlîm, just like his ovine
˘
counterpart (23). Furthermore, he is described as “without defect†(µwm wb
hyhAal), a fitting victim for the ensuing slaughter (24). In fact, it is likely
Absalom’s unshorn hair that proves his downfall when “his head†gets caught
in a tree and he is run through by the blades of Joab and his men (25). The mode
(21) See, e.g. J. WELLHAUSEN, Der Text der Bücher Samuelis (Göttingen 1871) 188;
MCCARTER, I-II Samuel, 330; CAQUOT – DE ROBERT, Les Livres de Samuel, 500; Cf. 1 Sam
28,23 and 2 Kgs 5,23 for ≈rp in similar contexts.
(22) S. HIRSCH, Sheep and Goats in Palestine (Tel Aviv 1933) 29. Spring shearing
seems to have arisen from the natural molting of primitive and undomesticated sheep that
occurs during this season. Another reason for spring shearing is that the warming weather
lessens the likelihood of illness to the bare flocks.
(23) It is noteworthy that the average annual yield of wool from an adult ram in Israel
is 2.25 kg. (HIRSCH, Sheep and Goats, 18), roughly equivalent to Absalom’s annual yield
of two hundred shekels (2 Sam 14,26; although compare the “one hundred†of LXX and
OL) or 2.2-2.6 kg. (see M.A. POWELL, “Weights and Measuresâ€, ABD VI, 905-907). The
comparison of Absalom to a member of the flock would not have been lost on an Israelite
audience, making his earlier sheepshearing exploits and the circumstances surrounding his
death all the more ironic.
(24) Cf. Deut 17,1, “You shall not sacrifice to YHWH your God an ox or a sheep in
which there is a defect (µwm wb hyhy), anything bad, for that is an abomination to YHWH your
Godâ€.
(25) So Josephus (Ant. 7.239) and the Talmud (Sot 9b). Others have argued that it is not
Absalom’s hair, but more generally his head, that is caught in the tree. See, for example,
G.R. DRIVER, “Plurima Mortis Imagoâ€, Studies and Essays in Honor of Abraham A.
Neuman (eds. M. BEN-HORIN – B. D. WEINRYB – S. ZEITLIN) (Leiden 1962) 131. The
question is over the meaning of “his headâ€, wçar. It seems significant that in the earlier
description of Absalom’s annual shave that the text says he shaved “his headâ€, suggesting
that wçar and wçar r[ç (2 Sam 14,26) share a semantic (and, of course, an anatomic) field.
If, in fact, Absalom is caught by his hair, then Absalom was coming due (or was past due)
for his annual springtime shave. Further suggesting that this event occurred in the spring is
that military engagements were usually initiated during this time of year.