Elie Assis, «Haggai: Structure and Meaning», Vol. 87 (2006) 531-541
This article uncovers a sophisticated structure of the Book of Haggai and its
significance. The structure of the book is part of the rhetoric of the prophet to
contend with the people’s thoughts that reality did not meet their hopes. They
expected in vain the renewal of the ‘old days’ to be immediate. Therefore, they
believed that God was not with them and felt they were still rejected by Him.
Haggai argues to the contrary: God was with them despite the seemingly
desperate situation, and the anticipated reality was bound to materialize, but only
gradually. The Book’s structure also shows that it is not a random collection of
oracles but one unified literary work.
Haggai: Structure and Meaning 535
The closing words of the fourth oracle (2,23) have a similar structure:
awhh µwyb (1)
twabx hwhyAµan (2)
ydb[ laytlavAˆb lbbrz ˚jqa (3)
hwhyAµan (4)
ytrjb ˚bAyk µtwjk ˚ytmcw (5)
twabx hwhy µan (6)
The closing verse of the fourth oracle also has an alternating structure,
between the contents of the messages and parenthetical clauses indicating that
God is the source of the message. The elements of the uneven lines constitute
the actual message, and each such part of a sentence is followed by the
parenthetical clause of the divine source (indicated by even numbers). The
structure of both verses is similar, except that at the close of the second there
is a double alternation, whereas a tripe alternation appears at the close of the
fourth oracle.
In both oracles the closing verse constitutes the climax. In the second, the
closing verse declares that the future glory of the Second Temple will be
greater than the glory of the First. The closing of the fourth oracle constitutes
the goal of the oracle which anticipates the elevation of the status of
Zerubbabel, descendant of King David and God’s chosen one. This structure
of a message interrupted by parenthetical clauses is designed to dramatise the
contents of the message. The triple alternating structure in the fourth oracle
creates an even greater dramatic effect. The dramatic fragmentation of the
message by recurring expressions of the divine source of the message
reinforces God’s status as originator of these changes.
To sum up, the four oracles of the book are divided into two; the first
two constitute the first part of the book, and the last two the second part.
Connections were found between the first two oracles of each part, and
between the second two oracles in each part. This structure shows that the
book is not a random collection of oracles arranged in chronological order,
but that it is one unified literary work. Moreover, the linguistic connections
indicate that the structure and wording of the oracles belong to the same
stratum (16).
5. The Meaning
Why were the oracles formulated in this elaborate structure? How does
the structure contribute to an understanding of the meaning of the book as a
whole? Generally, scholars consider that Haggai deals principally with the
question of how to motivate the people to rebuild the devastated temple in
the ruined Jerusalem (17). Indeed, this is the main theme running through most
of the material in the book, and this is the role attributed to Haggai in Ezra
5,1-2.
(16) In light of this elaborated structure, any attempt to rearrange the order of the
oracles should be rejected. I refer here especially to the proposal that 2,15-19 should follow
the date in 1,15a, see e.g.: ROTHSTEIN, Juden und Samaritaner, 53-73.
(17) See e.g.: MITCHELL, Haggai, 36-37.