Mark J. Boda, «Freeing the Burden of Prophecy:Mas%s%a4) and the Legitimacy of Prophecy in Zech 9–14», Vol. 87 (2006) 338-357
Prior to the 1980’s the definition of the Hebrew term mas%s%a4) as a reference to
prophetic speech or literature, was largely dominated by etymological
argumentation. However, Richard Weis, in his 1986 Claremont dissertation
leveraged form-critical categories and evidence to argue that this term was a
formal tag defining a particular type of literature, an argument that has been
applied and developed by the subsequent work of Marvin Sweeney (Isaiah,
FOTL; Book of the Twelve, Berit Olam) and Michael Floyd (JBL 12.1 [2002] 401-
422). This paper offers a critical review of this history of research with a view to
its impact on the interpretation of Zechariah 9–14. A new proposal is put forward
for the use of this term in Zechariah 9–14, one that reveals the influence of
Jeremianic tradition and highlights concern over certain prophetic streams in the
community that produced these texts.
Freeing the Burden of Prophecy 345
history and describes the historical manifestation of YHWH’s actions
in response to that problem. Zech 9–11; 12–14 and Malachi are treated
together because Weis proposes that they are a literary unit. Zech 9–11
responds to the expectations of Haggai and Zechariah (Hag 1,1–Zech
8,23). Zech 12–14 entails a reinterpretation based on the symbolic
action of Zech 11,4-17. Finally, Malachi responds to Haggai-Zechariah
as a whole, explicating why the community’s history does not appear
to manifest the intention of YHWH.
d) Genre definition
Near the end of his work, Weis synthesizes his analysis to provide
a genre definition. In terms of the genre’s constitution (that is the oral
origin of the genre), a ma¢¢Ë’ is “a prophetic speech or text unit,
composed by a prophet in order to show how YHWH’s acting or
intention will or does manifest itself in human affairs. It does this for
the purpose of providing insight into the future or direction for human
action in the present or near future. The immediate topic of the ma¢¢Ë’
will, in accord with this, always be some human historical entity
whether or not that entity is actually addressed directly, or in
apostrophe, by the text. The addressee of a ma¢¢Ë’ is either its topic or
the prophet’s own community†(22).
In terms of the genre’s use in the final form of the Hebrew Bible
the definition of ma¢¢Ë’ is more limited:
Except for Nah 1,2–3,19, the exemplars of the genre ma¢¢Ë’ that
survive in the final form of the Hebrew Bible are used to expound the
manifestation in human events and affairs of the divine plan/intention
revealed in some previously communicated expression of the divine
will. This previously communicated revelation is always outside the
ma¢¢Ë’. Except for Hab 1,2–2,20 this previously communicated [sic?]
is always found in the literary context of the ma¢¢Ë’. This is true even
if the ma¢¢Ë’ itself communicates a revelation as described above.
Moreover, this previous communication (be it speech, vision, drama,
symbolic action) is presented as communication through a prophet
and, at least in the final form, is written although, as with the genre
ma¢¢Ë’ itself, there are indications of oral delivery or performance.
Finally, the problem addressed concerns some question about the way
YHWH’s intention or acting will manifest itself in human affairs, but
the points at which the question may arise are significantly restricted.
The question may arise from an indeterminacy inherent in some
revelation of YHWHâ€s intention (e.g., Isa 30,6b-7; Ezek 12,11-16). It
may arise because the relation between some revelation of YHWH’s
(22) Ibid., 272.