Rick Strelan, «Who Was Bar Jesus (Acts 13,6-12)?», Vol. 85 (2004) 65-81
In Acts 13, Bar Jesus is confronted by Paul and cursed by him. This false prophet is generally thought to have been syncretistic and virtually pagan in his magical practices. This article argues that he was in fact very much within the synagogue and that he had been teaching the ways of the Lord. He was also a threat to the Christian community of Paphos and may even have belonged inside of it. Luke regards him as a serious threat to the faith because of his false teaching about righteousness and the ways of the Lord.
Who Was Bar Jesus (Acts 13,6-12)? 71
almost technically for those who oppose someone’s teaching or
prophecy (see also Gal 2,11; Acts 6,10). In addition, the strong
judgment that Luke, through the mouth of Paul, passes on Bar Jesus
parallels closely similar judgments made throughout the New
Testament on false teachers, false prophets, false brethren and the like
(Matt 7,15; 2 Cor 11,13; Gal 1,9; 2 Thess 2,11; 2 Pet 2,1; Rev 19,20).
In all cases, if these opponents are not actually within the
communities, they are very close to them, and that is what makes them
dangerous. And in this episode in Acts 13, Luke appears to be using
terminology commonly used in Christian circles when writing about
conflicts between false and true teachers or prophets (19).
It is reasonable to conclude that Bar Jesus was a Jewish prophet,
and one seen to be a serious threat to the Christian community, and
therefore one in some contact with that community. He was a serious
threat because he represented the word of God falsely and opposed the
understanding of it by others coming from outside and also claiming to
be prophets, namely, Saul and Barnabas (13,7-8). This episode, then,
tells of a battle between prophets, in much the same way as ‘orthodox’
prophets of Israel stood in opposition to those ‘false’ prophets who
also claimed authority to teach and reveal the ways of God. Klauck is
close to the mark when he says that Luke tells this story to warn
against an ‘all-devouring syncretism that at its worst even usurps
Christian substance such as the name of Jesus, and hence threatens the
Church from within’ (20). Klauck at least implies that Bar Jesus
represented an internal threat. I doubt, however, that syncretism is the
real problem for Luke; it is rather that this man interprets the way of
the Lord wrongly, and so his authority is questionable. Valid authority
only comes from those who have been given it by Jesus through the
legitimate apostles, teachers, and prophets who through prayer and
fasting and the laying on of hands, have been set apart by the Holy
Spirit for such work (13,1-3). The acceptable prophets and teachers at
Antioch are named by Luke (13,1); their teaching and prophecy are
authoritative in Lukan circles.
Further support for this understanding of Bar Jesus comes from the
charge brought against him by Paul that the prophet was ‘making
(19) Clearly, Bar Jesus is both a prophet and a teacher. The link is commonly
made; indeed, Luke has made it in 13,1 (Compare also 1 Cor 12,28; Did 13,2;
15,1-1).
(20) H.-J KLAUCK, Magic and Paganism in Early Christianity. The World of
the Acts of the Apostles (Translated by Brian McNeil) (Edinburgh 2000) 54.